Word reversal does not avoid deceptive similarity for Australian trade marks

Search for a command to run...

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
When you think of McDonald’s, you probably picture Big Macs and golden arches. But from a corporate structuring perspective, McDonald’s isn't primarily a fast-food company; it’s a masterclass in intel

Artificial Intelligence has transformed from a futuristic buzzword into a tangible business tool. One of the most cutting-edge applications we are seeing among our corporate clients is the creation of

The modern digital economy moves faster than traditional banking. For forward-thinking organisations, especially Co-operatives acting as hubs for digital services, community projects, or decentralised

When you sell physical goods, the product does the talking. A customer can hold a premium leather bag, test drive a car, or taste a craft beer. But what happens when what you sell is entirely invisibl

When most business owners think about their balance sheet, their minds jump to tangible assets: office buildings, inventory, manufacturing machinery, or vehicle fleets. There's a bias towards what you

In a notable decision by the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO), Woolworths Limited successfully opposed Flyers Group PLC's trade mark application, demonstrating that mere word reversal in trademarks does not circumvent issues of deceptive similarity.
Woolworths, which had launched and registered its PINK SUGAR brand in 2007 for girls' clothing and accessories, opposed the UK-based Flyers Group's application for a logo mark featuring the words SUGAR PINK. Despite the reverse order of the words, the Hearings Officer held that both marks conveyed the same essence of sweetness and femininity, a view further reinforced by the script and heart devices in Flyers Group's logo.
The decision emphasised that trademarks are not compared strictly side by side. The concept of imperfect recollection was pivotal in this case, highlighting the possibility of confusion between SUGAR PINK and PINK SUGAR in the minds of consumers. The similarities between the goods covered under Flyers Group's application and Woolworths' prior registration also played a significant role.
This ruling underscores the broader principles of trade mark law, particularly in the context of deceptive similarity. It is a caution to businesses that simple alterations in word order in trademarks may not distinguish new marks from existing ones.